As educational workers scrambled into emergency distance studying through the COVID-19 restrictions, we too needed to take on-line exams in individual with out compromising integrity. This disruption prompted us to consider carefully about how chemistry is assessed, as ‘enterprise as standard’ was not attainable – and at some establishments, there are not any plans to return to in-person exams.

For a lot of educational workers, the knee-jerk response to being pressured to run assessments on-line was to query whether or not educational integrity might be maintained. It’s recognized that learning-oriented environments have much less dishonest than aim or grade-oriented environments, so a place to begin is to construct relationships with college students that encourage them to study above take a look at efficiency.

Additionally, it is very important certify the appraisal to take care of the worth of the qualification. For any work submitted on-line, the query “Who did the work?” is generated. We now have seen that three totally different sources of data are used inappropriately by college students: collusion, simple sharing of data on-line; engines like google, which permit college students to search for solutions they have been anticipated to recollect or work on; and contract fraud, which permits college students to make funds and obtain solutions inside a really brief timeframe.

credit score: Carl Conway/Springer Nature Ltd.

A typical strategy to attempt to scale back collusion is to make use of swimming pools of questions, whereby every scholar receives a random take a look at consisting of 1 query from every pool. We discovered that questions that appeared similar to ours have been typically answered fairly otherwise by college students, which meant that college students may inadvertently be examined with totally different difficulties. It was shocking to study that whereas some variations of a query have been answered very poorly by college students, these variations for which Google gave the fallacious reply have been inputted by some college students. From this we realized that one third of our college students used Google searches throughout exams. The plain response that we must always simply write higher questions is that basis chemistry is extraordinarily troublesome to enact, for which there’s an enormous quantity of fabric available on-line.

Contract fraud has emerged as a significant problem to greater training, and has expanded dramatically throughout COVID-191, It’s fast, low cost and simple for college kids to get a written reply to any query, regardless of how excessive a degree or how a lot reasoning is required. College students are probably to make use of these companies on time-limited, high-stakes evaluation duties reminiscent of exams2, Coming into your personal questions into Google was a irritating expertise, as we acknowledged a few of our personal phrases, diagrams, and fonts on contract-fraud websites.

Distant proctoring has been adopted by many establishments in an try to forestall college students from copying throughout on-line examinations. This contains monitoring scholar keystrokes, cameras and/or microphones to detect behaviors which will point out dishonest, reminiscent of trying away from the display screen, speaking to others, or altering between browser tabs. Nonetheless, such surveillance invades college students’ privateness and is more likely to be significantly dangerous to college students from marginalized teams.3, and we’ve determined to not use any of those companies. As a substitute of viewing college students as opponents who should be managed to forestall dishonest, we are trying to deal with educational integrity by redesigning our evaluation capabilities.

In our high-enrollment models (1,000 college students per semester), workers money and time constraints imply that important parts of exams should be robotically marked, with both a number of alternative or ‘fill within the clean’ fashion questions. by use. College students coming into a phrase or quantity themselves, which could be marked robotically, is our most popular methodology because it avoids the issues related to a number of alternative questions, main college students to the proper reply based mostly on the given selections. could be carried out. We now have used ‘fill within the clean’ fashion questions in weekly on-line quizzes for a few years, so our college students encountered this query fashion even earlier than their first on-line examination in 2020. Typographical errors or surprising punctuation marks are incorrectly marked on this format; Consequently, we’ve realized to be very clear whereas structuring questions.

As a part of redeveloping exams for on-line supply, we lowered memorization necessities – a change we plan to take care of even after we return to in-person exams. College students are actually inspired to make their very own notes to confer with throughout their exams, as making ready for these notes can have a constructive studying impact, and might scale back stress by figuring out they are going to be obtainable. Huh4, Properly-designed, open-ended exams can enhance studying outcomes as a result of college students make use of approaches centered on understanding the which means of fabric in preparation for evaluation after they know their higher-order abilities shall be examined .5,

With regard to the web interface used to take the take a look at, we explored quite a few choices to permit college students to enter footage reminiscent of chemical constructions into an automatic platform, however with the mixing of solutions right into a studying administration system we would have liked Technical difficulties have been encountered. The simplest answer is for college kids to create constructions by hand and write multi-step responses, then add their solutions for guide marking, which permits for partial marks. This strategy permits us to ask higher-order questions which are troublesome to seek out solutions on-line for a part of the examination. We offer a template for handwritten responses to make clear expectations and simplify marking, and we offer alternatives for college kids to follow utilizing each presentation codecs (brief solutions and handwritten).

Importantly, after every take a look at, we now evaluation the issue of all variations of questions based mostly on the scholars’ scores. We additionally enter questions right into a search engine to see if there are any particular fallacious solutions that may be recognized in scholar responses. As well as, we verify if any questions have been posted on contract-fraud websites. We comply with query-writing pointers6Peer evaluation all questions from the educational crew, and analyze scholar outcomes to make iterative enhancements to our exams.

The instructing fashion of ‘that is the way you cross the examination’ instantly contributes to the goal-oriented atmosphere and thus will increase the probabilities of dishonest. As a substitute, we focus our instructing and evaluation on vital considering, and encourage college students to take possession of their studying. One other predictor of dishonest is that if college students really feel that their friends are getting away with it.7That is why we’re clear about our strict response to detection of breaches of educational integrity, in order that our college students could be assured that others usually are not benefiting from dishonest.

As a substitute of viewing college students as opponents who should be managed to forestall dishonest, we are trying to deal with educational integrity by redesigning our evaluation capabilities.

Issues with objectively evaluating giant courses usually are not new or distinctive to the web atmosphere, however on-line evaluation has exacerbated among the points and drew consideration to the weaknesses of conventional examinations. The shift to on-line exams serves as a chance to rethink evaluation and curriculum extra broadly. We wish to emphasize that we disagree with the deficit fixation, whereby college students are blamed for tutorial difficulties ensuing from racist and sexist energy constructions, and we imagine that the injustice of present academic programs8 On the coronary heart of scholar conduct. Current findings counsel that studying centered on reasoning can scale back gaps in efficiency amongst marginalized teams in STEM in comparison with their privileged friends.9, Thus, assessing chemical reasoning relatively than manipulating formulation and memorizing details can have the twin profit of constructing evaluation extra genuine and serving to to attain various teams of scholars. There are not any simple options, however we urge academics to consider carefully about what we wish our college students to know and have the ability to do, and the way we’re instructing and testing them.


  1. Lancaster, T. & Cotterlan, C. Contract fraud by STEM college students by way of a file-sharing web site: A COVID-19 pandemic perspective. int. J. Ed. Integer 173 (2021).

    Articles Google Scholar

  2. Bretag, T. et al. Contract fraud and appraisal design: Exploring the connection. evaluation. Eval. Excessive. Ed. 44676–691 (2019).

    Articles Google Scholar

  3. Silverman, S. At al. What occurs once you shut the door on distant proctoring? Shifting in direction of genuine evaluation with a people-centred strategy. to enhance the academy 39115–131 (2021).

    Articles Google Scholar

  4. Piontkivska, H., Gassensmith, JJ & Gallardo-Williams, MT Increasing inclusivity with learner-generated examine aids in three totally different science programs. J Chem. training. 983379-3383 (2021).

    CAS Articles Google Scholar

  5. Scholar, Ok. Impact of evaluation methodology on college students’ studying attitudes: A number of alternative query take a look at vs project essay. Excessive. training. 35453-472 (1998).

    Articles Google Scholar

  6. Haladyna, TM, Downing, SM and Rodriguez, MC A evaluation of a number of alternative item-writing pointers for classroom evaluation. Software. Measure. Ed. 15309-333 (2002).

    Articles Google Scholar

  7. McCabe, DL, Trevino, LK & Butterfield, KD Dishonest in educational establishments: a decade of analysis. moral conduct. 1 1219-232 (2001).

    Articles Google Scholar

  8. Van Duessen, B., Nissen, J., Talbot, R. M., Huvard, H. Physiotherapy. and Schultz, M. A Quantcrit investigation of society’s academic money owed as a consequence of racism and sexism in scholar studying of chemistry. J Chem. training. 9925-34 (2022).

    Articles Google Scholar

  9. Ralph, VR, Charlotte, LJ, Schwarz, CE, Baker, NM, and Stowe, RL Past tutorial follow: characterizing studying environments that assist college students clarify chemical phenomena. J. Race. scheduled caste. to show. (2022).

    Articles Google Scholar

Obtain Reference


The authors are M. Gallardo-Williams, V. Rosa Ralph, R. Sorensen-Unruh and all individuals within the #CER100 Studying Problem for the useful discussions.

creator data

creator and affiliation

Corresponding creator

Correspondence to Madeleine Schultz.

ethics declarations

competing pursuits

The authors declare no competing pursuits.

about this text

Verify currency and authenticity through Crossmark

cite this text

Schultz, M., Callahan, DL Perils and the promise of on-line exams.
web rave chemo 6, 299-300 (2022).

obtain quotes

Supply hyperlink